(Adbusters, self-described: We are a global network of culture jammers and creatives working to change the way information flows, the way corporations wield power, and the way meaning is produced in our society.)And although the phrase "mental environment" may seem fairly unremarkable as a coined term, it is an idea worthy of thoughtful consideration, essential as a part of our collective conversation. It's taken for granted that when we say or hear the phrase "protect the environment," or any other related phrase attached to the environmentalism movement, what is being referred to is our physical environment. And what about other environments? Globalization has been the hot button term for discussions on economic and cultural environments. There seem to be hundreds of pundits analyzing the political environment on the 24-hour news stations.
So what about the mental environment? Do we attend to this area as much as we do others, minding the positive or negative impacts of contributors to the environment? The last time I heard someone warn me about polluting my mind was most likely during a tirade by one of my teachers (probably one of the nuns) in grade school. And while in thinking back on my Catholic education, I now view a reasonable amount of what I was exposed to as mental pollution, conceptualizing of our mental environment as a mutable phenomenon, a potentially vulnerable entity to be guarded is pertinent to the maintenance of not only intellectual and emotional health but to every other area of well-being.
In another article on Adbusters, the progressive and insightful magazine that was so thoughtfully recommended to me by a couple of my wisest friends (Lauren and Jeff), Kalle Lasn and Micah White write on the "Ecology of the Mind." They argue that we are faced with an entirely new set of existential challenges in a world where an increasing number of our experiences come to us secondhand, that is, not physically or directly but through virtual worlds. And because of this, we must be cognizant of the present threats to our mental well-being. These potential mental pollutants, according to Lasn and White, are: noise, infotoxins and infoviruses, the erosion of empathy, loss of infodiversity, the fragmentation of our psyches, and the running out of culture. Is it not a wonder that our minds are caught in such turmoil when we are exposed to an atmosphere that is saturated with stimuli, wrought with messages that impress upon us the value of productivity at any cost, an ideal of blind consumerism, and general insatiability?
Granted, psychological dismay was felt by people long before the advent of our hyper-industrial, technological age. Sadness, confusion, loss of purpose - even mental illness befell many individuals of bygone days. Hysterical fits were thought as the sign of a dark force, maybe possession by a demon or an experiment in witchery. But just as other organs in our bodies can become sick and infected, our brain can so, too. And there are many ailments that can materialize in the brain which are readily perceivable; our eyes can plainly see if someone's head is punctured and MRIs can show where tumors are present. It is those less tangible neurological disorders that are much more difficult to account for and treat. While the human body is intricate enough, the brain is an even more complicated, rapidly-changing component on its own. Not only can physical changes - what we eat and how much we exercise - affect our brain's functioning, emotional and intellectual forces can and do cause profound influence. And to top that off, scientists and medical professionals are just beginning to open the flood gates to the secrets of our neurological states. There are more uncharted pathways and yet-to-be-discovered elements within our minds than there are presumably in any other major area of the human anatomy.
Why, then, do we yet judge those high and low emotions - mania, anxiety, depression, compulsions - and all other 'maladaptive' behaviors as somehow outside of the human condition? When we see this in others, or hear of it, what is it that causes us to cringe and alienate those who suffer? Is it that we see something that could be, or is deep down, a part of all of us? Even for those of us who will admit to experiencing these states tend to cling to the archaic notion that they are in some way perverse, unreasonable malfunctions - unfortunate, but nonetheless, something to be feared.
Well, emotions are not unnatural. And given our current state of affairs, I almost find it to be abnormal for us to not be highly affected or highly emotional over some of the events and ideas that surround us. And for all those suffering from mental illness in some form (including myself), do not be ashamed.
And while we do not have the answers to everything - to all the complexities of our brains, to the landscape of our mental environment, to the challenges we face in a world filled with millions of varying viewpoints and aims for the future - this does not give us reason to abandon. Remain attuned to caring for the mental environment. Judge not those who appear to be on the margins of a 'normal' society. And most importantly, do not retreat due to confusion or feelings of powerlessness.
Take a breath. You are not the whole world, but you are still a part of it.
